|
|
USE OF SURFACE WATER IN TEXAS, 2000
|
|

|
|
Total Use: 6.83 million acre-feet
|
|
Source: Texas Water Development Board, "Summary Historical Water
Use, 2000," 2003.
|
|
Regulation of Surface Water Rights
In 1967, following a historic drought, the Texas legislature passed a law known as the "Water Rights
Adjudication Act." This act consolidated all surface water rights into a unified system by transforming previously held Spanish and Mexican grants, riparian water rights,
and claims into "certificates of adjudication." The act required all riparian and unrecorded users of water to file claims with the Texas Water Commission (now the
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, or TCEQ) to be based upon actual use during the years 1963-1967.
The then-Water Commission then evaluated all water right claims, including any claim filed prior to the act.
Approval of any water right by the commission also required court approval. All rights approved by the courts are called "Certificates of Adjudication." After
1969, anyone wishing to obtain a new water right must seek a permit from the state. Today, only water claims in the upper Rio Grande near El Paso remain unadjudicated in
an ongoing, complex legal battle over whether the state, federal government, or irrigation districts to Rio Grande water coming from federal dams in New Mexico.*
Thus, today, surface water rights are issued to irrigators, cities, industries, power plants and individuals with the
following terms and conditions:
- a maximum amount of water (in acre-feet) that may be used each year,
- a maximum diversion rate,
- a diversion point(s),
- a purpose of use (e.g., municipal, irrigation, mining),
- a place of use, and
- other additional restrictions, including:
- streamflow restrictions in some cases to protect:
- existing water rights holders,
- water quality,
- aquatic fish and wildlife habitat,
- inflows for bays and estuaries,
- recreational uses,
- habitat mitigation measures, and
- water conservation measures.
To change any of the terms or conditions --including transfers or leases -- of the right requires authorization from the
TCEQ. In its administration of water rights, the TCEQ, by law, must balance requests for new rights or for amendments
against statutory responsibilities to also protect water quality, in-stream uses, and freshwater inflows to bays and estuaries.
|
ACTIVE SURFACE WATER RIGHT HOLDER USES IN TEXAS
AS OF AUGUST, 2002
|
|
TYPE
|
TOTAL #
|
SIZE*
|
MORE THAN 10,000 ACRE-FEET
|
Largest Individual Water Rights Holder
|
SIZE*
|
|
Municipal
|
803
|
12.54
|
28
|
LCRA
|
7.81
|
|
Industrial
|
434
|
17.15
|
125
|
Dow Chemical Co.
|
16.70
|
|
Irrigation
|
5,743
|
5.40
|
62
|
El Paso Co. WID No. 1
|
3.99
|
|
Mining, Oil & Gas
|
159
|
0.18
|
2
|
U.S Dept. of Energy
|
0.08
|
|
Hydroelectric
|
15
|
11.23
|
15
|
LCRA
|
11.23
|
|
Other
|
201
|
0.41
|
5
|
Texas Water Develop. Bd. (for proposed Dam)
|
0.27
|
|
Total
|
7,355
|
46.9
|
235
|
|
40.09
|
|
The total number of water right holders includes contractual permits and
agreements. In many cases, one water right holder -- such as the City of Dallas -- owns multiple uses for municipal, industrial and hydroelectric power. This is
counted as three separate water right uses even though it is only one holder. The 46.90 total million acre-feet of authorized use includes impoundments and
authorized but unbuilt reservoirs, contractual permits and agreements, as well as non-consumptive uses, which total approximately 20 million acre-feet. The
industrial uses includes cooling uses of which some is brackish waters of the estuaries. *Million of acre-feet
|
|
Source: Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Water Rights Database
|
|
As of August of 2002, excluding contractual permits and agreements between water rights holders, there
were some 6,230 active water rights for both consumptive and non-consumptive rights of water.* However, a small number of these
water rights-some 235 water right holders with more than 10,000 acre-feet in their water right --have access to most of the water.*
Irrigation rights make up the greatest percentage of the number of rights, but most of these irrigation rights are for 100 acre-feet or less.* Large irrigators in Texas rely principally on groundwater.
Surface water rights can be sold, amended, leased, or transferred. In Texas, over 90 percent of surface
water has already been adjudicated, and some rivers, like the Rio Grande, are actually overappropriated. This means that if all holders used all their water rights-particularly during dry
periods-there would be no flow in the river.*
To encourage conservation, the Commission in April 1993 modified its rules to allow water rights holders to
retain for future use the rights to water conserved through water use efficiency. Prior to this rule change, permit holders were in a "use it or lose it" position, which discouraged
conservation.*
Direct and Indirect Reuse of Water Rights
|
RIVERS WITH LITTLE OR NO WATER AVAILABLE FOR APPROPRIATION
|
|

|
|
Source: Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission, State of
Texas Water Quality Inventory, 12th edition (TNRCC, 1995) 82
|
|
The passage of Senate Bill 1, the state water plan, which took effect on September 1, 1997,
reconfirmed that existing water rights holders who take water out of a reservoir or stream can use and reuse up to 100 percent of the water prior to its discharge to the stream,
providing there is no return-flow requirement in the permitted water right itself.* For
example, a municipality can reuse wastewater for a variety of domestic and municipal uses-irrigation of golf courses and parks-without needing an additional water
rights permit. This type of reuse is known as direct reuse.
Once water is used and is discharged to a streambed, however, it becomes property of
the state. Any water rights holders who wish to divert their water for reuse after it has been discharged must obtain authorization from the TCEQ through a "bed and banks" permit. Under
SB 1, this type of indirect reuse might require that some surplus water be returned to the river or stream to protect senior downstream water users and environmental needs. In
addition, SB 1 allows the TCEQ to condition new or amended water rights to provide for return flows, potentially limiting the direct reuse of wastewater as well.*
|